Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 71(9): 439-445, 2021 12 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sleepiness associated with night shift working (NSW) is known to adversely affect workers' health and well-being. It has been associated with adverse safety outcomes and is a recognized workplace hazard among healthcare workers. AIMS: This study was aimed to assess the prevalence of self-reported sleepiness in NSW nurses and midwives. This study also explored the consequences of sleepiness on safety at work and driving. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of NSW nurses and midwives was conducted at an National Health Service (NHS) hospital trust from 16 March 2020 to 1 June 2020. Data were collected by online questionnaire and included information on demographics, shift work and safety aspects. Sleepiness was assessed with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). RESULTS: Data collection coincided with the first coronavirus pandemic peak in England. Out of 1985 eligible NSW nurses and midwives, 229 participated in the study, with a response rate of 12%. The prevalence of sleepiness was 28%. Following a night shift, 49% of nurses reported nodding off at the wheel and 44% reported a near-miss car accident in past 12 months. An abnormal ESS score was significantly associated with near-miss car accidents (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-5.77) and with low confidence in undertaking complex tasks at night (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.20-5.84). CONCLUSIONS: More than a quarter of NSW nurses and midwives reported excessive daytime sleepiness although, due to the low response rate, this may not be representative. Adverse driving events were common. Elevated ESS scores correlated well with safety issues relating to work and driving.


Subject(s)
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Nurses , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/etiology , Humans , Sleepiness , State Medicine , Surveys and Questionnaires , Wakefulness , Work Schedule Tolerance
2.
BMC Neurol ; 22(1): 417, 2022 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2117395

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Long-onset COVID syndrome has been described in patients with COVID-19 infection with persistence of symptoms or development of sequelae beyond 4 weeks after the onset of acute symptoms, a medium- and long-term consequence of COVID-19. This syndrome can affect up to 32% of affected individuals, with symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, chest pain, cognitive disorders, insomnia, and psychiatric disorders. The present study aimed to characterize and evaluate the prevalence of sleep symptoms in patients with long COVID syndrome. METHODOLOGY: A total of 207 patients with post-COVID symptoms were evaluated through clinical evaluation with a neurologist and specific exams in the subgroup complaining of excessive sleepiness. RESULTS: Among 189 patients included in the long COVID sample, 48 (25.3%) had sleep-related symptoms. Insomnia was reported by 42 patients (22.2%), and excessive sleepiness (ES) was reported by 6 patients (3.17%). Four patients with ES were evaluated with polysomnography and test, multiple sleep latencies test, and actigraphic data. Two patients had a diagnosis of central hypersomnia, and one had narcolepsy. A history of steroid use was related to sleep complaints (insomnia and excessive sleepiness), whereas depression was related to excessive sleepiness. We observed a high prevalence of cognitive complaints in these patients. CONCLUSION: Complaints related to sleep, such as insomnia and excessive sleepiness, seem to be part of the clinical post-acute syndrome (long COVID syndrome), composing part of its clinical spectrum, relating to some clinical data.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Sleep Wake Disorders , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Sleepiness , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/diagnosis , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Syndrome , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
3.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(18)2022 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2032927

ABSTRACT

This study identified clinical nurses' fatigue and related factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a cross-sectional study. Data were collected from South Korean hospitals on 234 nurses' general characteristics, fatigue, depression, occupational stress, insomnia, and perceived daytime sleepiness using a structured questionnaire. The prevalence of fatigue was 62.0%, depression 52.1%, insomnia 20.7%, and daytime sleepiness 36.1%. Insomnia, sleepiness, depression, and occupational stress were significantly associated with fatigue. Ward nurses who cared for COVID-19 patients within the past month had significantly higher occupational stress related to organizational climate than those who had not provided care, and ICU nurses who cared for COVID-19 patients had significantly higher job insecurity-related occupational stress. Nurses have a high prevalence of fatigue and depression during the pandemic. Thus, insomnia, sleepiness, depression, and occupational stress must be reduced to lower nurses' fatigue. Caring for COVID-19 patients was not significantly associated with fatigue, but there were significant differences in occupational stress between nurses who provided such care and those who did not. Work environment-specific strategies are needed to reduce nurses' occupational stress during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Nurses , Occupational Stress , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Fatigue/epidemiology , Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Pandemics , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Sleepiness , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Neurology ; 99(14): e1475-e1485, 2022 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1974187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown effect on sleep symptoms in patients with narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), and restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: Between March and May 2020, a sample of adult patients regularly followed up in a Reference Hospital Sleep Unit (299 with narcolepsy, 260 with IH, and 254 with RLS) was offered an online survey assessing their sleep-wake habits, daily activities, medication intake, and validated scales: International RLS Study Group questionnaire, Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), IH Severity Scale (IHSS), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Insomnia Severity Index, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and European Quality of Life (QoL) scale. The survey was proposed once, and the questions were answered for the prelockdown (recall of the month before the confinement) and the lockdown (time of study) periods. RESULTS: Overall, 331 patients completed the survey (response rate 40.7%): 102 with narcolepsy, 81 with IH, and 148 with RLS. All patients reported later bedtimes, with reduced differences for time in bed (TIB) and total sleep time (TST) over 24 hours between weekdays and weekends. Patients with narcolepsy spent more TIB and increased TST overnight, with more daytime napping. They had more awakenings, higher ESS scores, lower QoL, and no NSS changes. Patients with IH also increased their TIB, TST overnight and 24 hours on weekdays. Nocturnal sleep latency and the number of awakenings increased but with no change in ESS, QoL, and IHSS scores. Patients with RLS reported longer nocturnal sleep latency, more awakenings, more naps, decreased TIB, and TST overnight. RLS severity increased while QoL decreased. A significant portion of patients reported disease worsening during the lockdown (narcolepsy: 39.4%, IH: 43.6%, and RLS: 32.8%), and some patients stopped or lowered their medication (narcolepsy: 22.5%, IH: 28%, and RLS: 9.5%). DISCUSSION: During the lockdown, all patients reported later bedtimes; those with narcolepsy and IH extended their sleep duration unlike patients with RLS. These changes were often associated with negative consequences on QoL. In the current context of recurrent COVID-19 waves, the recent development of teleconsultations should enable physicians to monitor patients with chronic sleep disorders more closely and to recommend optimized sleep schedules and duration, in order to prevent psychological problems and improve their QoL.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Idiopathic Hypersomnia , Narcolepsy , Restless Legs Syndrome , Adult , Communicable Disease Control , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Humans , Narcolepsy/complications , Narcolepsy/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Restless Legs Syndrome/complications , Restless Legs Syndrome/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep
5.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(11)2022 06 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1884147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted nearly all sectors of our population, including college students, who continue to share disproportionate rate of disparities. In this study, we aimed to identity key sleep health characteristics, including markers for obstructive sleep apnea, as well as its relation to mental health, physical health, and academic performance. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design with online survey dissemination was used. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were conducted among a predominantly minority population. RESULTS: Results show that nearly 78% of the population reported that the pandemic impacted their mental or physical health, while over 83% reported daytime tiredness/fatigue/sleepiness, and another 61% reported sleeping less than seven hours during weekdays. Among other associations, pandemic-related poor sleep health, including sleeping less than seven hours, was associated with daytime tiredness/fatigue/sleepiness, psychological distress, as well as low mental health and physical health. A severe marker for obstructive sleep apnea, having stopped breathing during sleep, was also associated with psychological distress during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep health interventions are critical for optimizing college student health and well-being, including improving mental health outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Fatigue/epidemiology , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Mental Health , Pandemics , Sleep , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Sleepiness , Students/psychology
6.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 29(38): 57851-57859, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1767584

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has posed a great impact on people's mental health, especially for undergraduate students. This study aimed to compare the mental health conditions and academic burnout between medical and non-medical undergraduates in China when the COVID-19 pandemic is mitigating. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 4,972 undergraduates between October 2020 and April 2021, when the pandemic was basically under control. The survey included basic demographics information and standardized scales to evaluate depression, anxiety, perceived stress, daytime sleepiness, alcohol abuse/dependence, quality of life, fatigue, and academic burnout. Compared with medical undergraduates, non-medical undergraduates had higher rates of moderate to severe depression symptoms (29.1% vs. 17.9%, P < 0.001), moderate to severe anxiety symptoms (19.7% vs. 8.9%, P < 0.001), alcohol abuse/dependence (16.3% vs.10.3%, P < 0.001), excessive daytime sleepiness (47.4% vs. 43.4%, P = 0.018), high perceived stress (34.7% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001), high level of fatigue (51.8% vs. 42.2%, P < 0.001), low QOL (35.8% vs. 21.4%, P < 0.001), and higher academic burnout score (59.4 vs. 57.5, P < 0.001). Being non-medical undergraduates, depression, alcohol abuse/dependence, excessive daytime sleepiness, and high perceived stress were positively associated with academic burnout, while high QOL was negatively associated with the burnout (all P < 0.001). Excessive daytime sleepiness was the strongest predictor for academic burnout.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Burnout, Professional/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Fatigue/epidemiology , Humans , Mental Health , Pandemics , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Students/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Saudi Med J ; 42(4): 384-390, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1513255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To measure the Saudi population's sleep quality during the lockdown of COVID-19. METHODS: An internet-based questionnaire that was performed during the lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic among the Saudi population over 2 weeks from April 1 to April 15, 2020. We used the instant messaging application WhatsApp and Twitter to reach the targeted population. Saudi citizens and non-Saudi residents who can read and understand the questionnaire were recruited. Data were analyzed using Stata and SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 790 responses were included. The majority of participants were the Saudi population 735 (92.9%). The prevalence of insomnia and poor sleep quality were 54.4% and 55.5%, respectively. Saudi citizenship was associated with longer sleep duration (p=0.031). Female gender and being married were associated with worse global PSQI, sleep quality, sleep distribution, sleep latency, and daytime dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Saudi population had a high prevalence of insomnia and poor sleep quality. Routine monitoring of the psychological impact of life-threatening outbreaks and the adoption of effective early mental health actions should be considered.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep , Adult , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Public Policy , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Sleep Latency , Surveys and Questionnaires , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data
8.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 18(1): 255-263, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1328231

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related restrictions on narcolepsy type 1 (NT2), narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). METHODS: Participants with NT1, NT2, and IH followed in a university hospital completed an online 78-question survey assessing demographic, clinical, and occupational features of the population during the first COVID-19-related lockdown. RESULTS: A total of 219 of 851 (25.7%) respondents of the survey reported a mean increase of 1.2 ± 1.9 hours (P < .001) in night sleep time and a mean decrease of 1.0 ± 3.4 points (P < .001) on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale during lockdown. Bedtime was delayed by 46.1% of participants and wakeup time was delayed by 59.6%, driven primarily by participants with IH. Teleworkers (but not in-person workers) reported a mean increase of 0.9 ± 1.2 hours in night sleep (P < .001) and a mean decrease in sleepiness score of 1.6 ± 3.1 (P < .001). Cataplexy improved in 54.1% of participants with NT1. Sleepiness correlated with psychological wellness (r = .3, P < .001). As many as 42.5% enjoyed the lockdown, thanks to reallocation of time usually spent commuting toward longer sleep time, hobbies, and family time, and appreciated a freer napping schedule. Conversely, 13.2% disliked the lockdown, feeling isolation and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Extended sleep time, circadian delay (in patients with IH), and teleworking resulted in decreased symptoms of central hypersomnias. These findings suggest that people with IH, NT1, and NT2 may benefit from a decrease in social and professional constraints on sleep-wake habits, and support advocacy efforts aimed at facilitating workplace and schedule accommodations for this population. CITATION: Nigam M, Hippolyte A, Dodet P, et al. Sleeping through a pandemic: impact of COVID-19-related restrictions on narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):255-263.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Idiopathic Hypersomnia , Narcolepsy , Communicable Disease Control , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Humans , Idiopathic Hypersomnia/complications , Idiopathic Hypersomnia/drug therapy , Idiopathic Hypersomnia/epidemiology , Narcolepsy/drug therapy , Narcolepsy/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sleep
9.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(13)2021 06 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1302304

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to examine the prevalence rates of poor quality sleep and daytime sleepiness in health professionals and their association with socioeconomic, lifestyle, and anthropometric factors and psychosocial work conditions. This cross-sectional study was performed with health professionals from various public and private hospitals in Rio Verde, Goiás, Brazil. Daytime sleepiness and sleep quality were assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, respectively. The variables were analyzed using multiple hierarchical Poisson regression in the statistical package Stata version 13.0. A total of 244 health professionals participated in this study (women, 78.28%). The rates of abnormal daytime sleepiness and poor sleep quality were 50.41% (n = 123) and 55.74% (n = 136), respectively. Reduced physical activity was associated with poor sleep quality (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.70, p = 0.035). Age between 20 and 29 years (PR = 2.59; 95% CI 1.37-4.91, p = 0.021) and 30 and 49 years (PR = 2.09; 95% CI 1.12-3.91, p = 0.021), as well as excessive alcohol consumption (PR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.01-1.66, p = 0.048), were risk factors for daytime sleepiness. Conversely, adequate bodyweight (PR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.33-0.82, p = 0.005) was considered a protective factor. The present findings suggest high rates of abnormal daytime sleepiness and poor sleep quality among healthcare professionals. We emphasize the importance of physical activity, adequate weight, and healthy habits for better quality sleep and reduced daytime sleepiness.


Subject(s)
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Sleep Wake Disorders , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Prevalence , Sleep , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL